White paper · Law Firms

Law Firm IT Setup Guide: Security and Ethics in Virginia

How to set up the computers, email, network, cloud services and vendors in a small law firm so client confidences stay confidential and trust account money stays put. Each step says plainly whether a rule requires it or official guidance recommends it.

By Umair Akhtar, Founder & President, JPert INC Published November 1, 2026 Last reviewed November 1, 2026 About a 12-minute read

The short version

  • Virginia lawyers have a duty to keep up with "the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology" (Rule 1.1, Comment [6]) and to make "reasonable efforts" to prevent unauthorized access to client information (Rule 1.6(d)). Both have applied since March 1, 2016.
  • Rule 1.6's own commentary lists "the employment or engagement of persons competent with technology" as one factor in whether a firm's efforts were reasonable.
  • No rule prescribes a specific technology. Reasonable efforts in 2026 look like multi-factor sign-in, encrypted devices, tested backups, careful vendor selection and a call-back rule for any wire instructions.
  • Business email compromise cost U.S. victims more than $3 billion in 2025, according to the FBI. For a law firm, the fastest way to lose client money is a fake change to wire instructions.

Who this is for and how to read it

This white paper is for managing partners, firm administrators and office managers at Virginia law firms with roughly 5 to 100 people and no full-time IT department. Every recommendation is labeled:

We cite Virginia's rule numbers, which differ from the ABA Model Rules. This is general guidance, not legal or ethics advice. For a specific question, the Virginia State Bar's ethics hotline and your own ethics counsel are the right resources.

The rules that apply today

Competence and confidentiality

Required In December 2015 the Supreme Court of Virginia added a technology comment to Rule 1.1 (Competence): "Attention should be paid to the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology." It also added Rule 1.6(d), which requires a lawyer to "make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to" client information. Both took effect March 1, 2016. The matching ABA Model Rules are Rule 1.1, Comment 8 and Rule 1.6(c).

Comment [19] to Virginia's Rule 1.6 lists the factors used to judge whether efforts were reasonable: how sensitive the information is, how likely disclosure is without more safeguards, the cost and difficulty of more safeguards, the effect on the lawyer's ability to represent clients, and "the employment or engagement of persons competent with technology."

Vendors, cloud storage and remote staff

Virginia's Legal Ethics Opinion 1872, "Virtual Law Office and Use of Executive Office Suites," was approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia on October 2, 2019. It says a lawyer using an outside vendor to store or handle client information must choose the vendor carefully, review its technology and terms of service, instruct it to keep information confidential, and get help from someone qualified if the lawyer cannot judge the vendor alone. It also says a lawyer "is not required, of course, to absolutely guarantee that a breach of confidentiality cannot occur." The opinion applies Rule 5.3's duty to supervise non-lawyer staff to staff who are not physically in the office.

Generative AI

The ABA's Formal Opinion 512 (July 29, 2024) applies the competence, confidentiality, communication and fee rules to generative AI tools. In practice, that means knowing where a tool sends the text you type into it before you paste in client information.

Virginia's breach law

Required Like every Virginia business, a law firm that loses unencrypted Social Security, driver's license or financial account numbers must notify affected residents and the Virginia Attorney General without unreasonable delay (Va. Code 18.2-186.6). Encrypted data is excluded unless the key was also compromised. The Attorney General can impose a civil penalty of up to $150,000 per breach.

Step 1: Accounts, passwords and multi-factor sign-in

For a firm, the most important account is email, because it is where clients send documents and where criminals send fake wire instructions. Turn on MFA there first.

Step 2: Email and wire fraud

The FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report recorded more than $3 billion in business email compromise losses, and Virginia ranked 10th in the country in total cybercrime losses ($476.1 million). Real estate closings, settlements and trust account disbursements are prime targets.

Step 3: Computers, phones and remote work

Recommended Remote and hybrid work. LEO 1872 applies supervision duties to staff who work outside the office. Practical controls are firm-managed laptops (not personal home computers) for client work, MFA and a VPN or secure access service for remote connections, and a short written policy on working from home and public Wi-Fi.

Step 4: Office network and Wi-Fi

Many firms share space or use executive suites. LEO 1872 discusses executive office suites directly. If you share a network with other tenants, treat it as untrusted: use your own firewall and Wi-Fi for firm devices.

Step 5: Client files, cloud services and vendors

Recommended In 2022, CISA, the NSA, the FBI and allied agencies published joint guidance for organizations that use a managed service provider (MSP). It says your contract should require MFA on every account the provider uses, least-privilege access, defined incident reporting, backup and incident-response duties, and prompt removal of the provider's access when the contract ends. Ask any IT provider, including us, to show you those terms in writing.

Step 6: Backups and staying open after an attack

Court deadlines do not move because of ransomware. Decide in advance which systems must come back first, usually email, calendar and docketing, and the document management system, and how the firm will meet deadlines if they are down.

Step 7: When something goes wrong

One-page setup checklist

AreaWhat to have in placeStatus today
Ethics basisWritten note of how the firm meets Rule 1.1 Comment [6] and Rule 1.6(d)Required
MFAOn email, remote access, cloud apps and admin accountsRecommended
Passwords15+ character passphrases, password manager, no forced rotationRecommended
Wire fraudWritten call-back rule; clients told you never change wire instructions by emailRecommended
EmailSPF, DKIM and DMARC; external tags; encrypted sending or portalRecommended
DevicesEncrypted, auto-updated, monitored; no unsupported Windows 10Recommended
NetworkFirm firewall, separate guest Wi-Fi, no exposed remote desktopRecommended
VendorsDocumented review of each cloud vendor (LEO 1872); MSP contract termsRecommended
BackupsOffline or locked copy, cloud data included, restores testedRecommended
IncidentsPrinted one-page plan; breach notice process under Va. Code 18.2-186.6Required notice, Recommended plan

How JPert can help

JPert is a managed IT and cybersecurity company in Vienna, Virginia, near Tysons. Rule 1.6's commentary recognizes "persons competent with technology" as part of reasonable efforts; that is the role we play for law firms across Northern Virginia. Read about IT for law firms, or book a free IT assessment.

Related reading from our Chronicles: wire fraud prevention for law firms, law firm incident response plan and Microsoft 365 security for law firms.

Sources

Every recommendation above comes from these official sources, checked on November 1, 2026:

This white paper is general information about IT and security practices, not legal or ethics advice. Rules and ethics opinions change; we review this paper when they do. See our editorial policy.

FAQ

Common questions from law firms

No. Rule 1.6(d) requires reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to client information, and Rule 1.1 Comment [6] requires attention to the benefits and risks of relevant technology. The rules do not name tools. Reasonableness depends on factors listed in Comment [19], including the sensitivity of the information and the cost of safeguards.

Yes, with care. Legal Ethics Opinion 1872 says lawyers must choose vendors carefully, review their technology and terms of service, instruct them to keep information confidential, and consult a qualified person if they cannot judge the vendor themselves. It does not require a guarantee that no breach can occur.

Multi-factor sign-in on email, paired with a written rule that any change to wire instructions is confirmed by phone using a known number. Email account takeover and fake wire instructions are among the most common ways firms and clients lose money.

Yes. Va. Code 18.2-186.6 applies to any business that holds covered personal information, such as Social Security or financial account numbers, and requires notice to affected residents and the Attorney General without unreasonable delay if unencrypted data is breached.

Want us to check your firm against this guide?

Book a free IT assessment. Our Vienna, VA team will review your setup and give you a plain-English list of what to fix first.